Wednesday, December 20, 2023

2023'S 10 BEST THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS

2023 was a relatively meager year for theater, and the first year in memory that I had to stretch to come up with 10 worthy productions that can accuartely be called "the best."  While I have serious concerns about the future of off-Broadway, regional non-profits and works of serious drama, I am somewhat heartened to find 4 new plays and revivals of 3 serious dramas on my list.  Plus, a year that brings a stellar new work plus a solid revival from Stephen Sondheim is noteworthy.

In order of preference my 10 best shows of 2023 were:


1. STEREOPHONIC [Playwright's Horizons]- surprisingly universal & sublime

2. HERE WE ARE [The Shed]- Sondheim's last great gift to the world

3. A DOLL'S HOUSE [Broadway]- Jessica Chastain's image & performance are imprinted in me

4. MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG [Broadway]- supporting cast is hugely improved from off-Broadway

5. PRIMARY TRUST [Roundabout]- beautifully written and emotionally astute

6. APPROPRIATE [Broadway/Second Stage]- Branden Jacobs Jenkins' best where it belongs

7. THE DOCTOR [Park Ave Armory]- Juilet Stevenson was mesmerizing in this thoughtful adaptation

8. THE COMEUPPANCE [Signature Theatre]- Branden Jacobs Jenkins again at the top of his game

9. BRIGHT NEW BOISE [Signature Theatre]- breathed new life into this Samuel Hunter play

10.  BEYONCE'S RENAISSANCE CONCERT*- it broke my soul, in a good way

Honorable Mentions: SHUCKED [Broadway]; ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW [Dallas Theater Center]

*Yes, a concert is not technically "theater"; but this was no ordinary concert and it was enormously theatrical in scope and execution, so it justifies its placement on this list.


Sunday, October 22, 2023

Sondheim/Ives' "Here We Are" Is The Highlight of Fall NY Theater Season

Unfortunately, there is little to be excited about with respect the new shows opening this fall in New York City.  There is not a serious drama playing on Broadway, and all of the new shows this fall are either musicals or comedies.  Off-Broadway is also offering slim pickings this fall as most off-Broadway theater companies have significantly reduced their schedules presumably due to budgetary concerns.

Notwithstanding the above, one new show I saw on a recent trip to NY proved to be a winner on many levels, namely the new Steven Sondheim/ David Ives musical "Here Were Are" at The Shed in Hudson Yards.  While developed during Sondheim's final years, there was some doubt that the show (which was at one point entitled "Square One") would be staged because it was not quite finished when Mr. Sondheim passed away.  Thankfully the creators (book writer David Ives and director Joe Mantello chief among them) contniued their work on the show and have provided theatergoers with the gift of this impeccably crafted production of "Here We Are."

The show is "inspired by" two Luis Bunel films, neither of which I had seen before viewing the show, although I had a sense of the general plots of both films.   I am glad I had not seen either film, because it enabled to admire the brilliance of the show without any preconceived notions.  I had read online chatter from the earliest previews that the two acts were disjointed and that the work feels unfinished.  Neither proved to be the case for me, as I thought the two acts were beautifully integrated, and the relative dearth of music in the second act made perfect sense to me in the context of the show.   The interplay of the two acts in "Here We Are" are much like that in Sondheim's "Into The Woods," in that the first, more humorous act is the set up to exploration of more serious and deeper themes of the second act.  

The production elements of "Here We Are" are sheer theatrical perfection.  The cast includes many of the finest theater actors of our time, all working at the top of their game.  The direction is precise and fluid.  The scenic design, costumes (both by David Zinn), choreography (appropriately more movement by Sam Pinkleton) lighting (by Natasha Katz), sound (by Tom Gibbons, and orchestrations (by longtime Sondheim collaborator Jonathan Tunik) all work to create a work so professionally executed that I was in awe at the stagecraft on display from beginning to end.

While I hesitate to separate any cast member out given that they are all great, I cannot avoid noting that David Hyde Pierce and Rachel Bay Jones are standouts as the heart and soul of the show.

I left "Here We Are" wanting to see the show again, and I hope I have the opportunity to do so.  I am not sure this thoughtful and rather quirky show would find an audience on Broadway, nor am I confident that  it will be met with overwhelming critical acclaim.  But in a world in which many like me are feeling a sense of existential dread due to world unrest and upcoming elections, "Here We Are" for me proved to a balm of comfort for its glimmer of hope for where we are as a nation and world.

While I enjoyed the comedic elements of two new Broadway plays, Jocelyn Bioh's "Jaja's African Hair Braiding" and the revival of Ossie Davis' "Purlie Victorious," both suffered from flawed elements.  In "Jaja's" the attempt by the playwright to introduce a serious thematic turn of events felt forced and unnuanced.  In "Purlie" the wildly over the top performance of Kara Young offset the balance of the otherwise fine cast, a flaw for which I fault the direction.  Nevertheless, both are worth seeing in a current Broadway play landscape with few quality new productions.

The rarely revived and now revised Rome/Weidman 1962 musical "I Can Get It For You For Wholesale" is worth seeing at Classic Stage largely for the talent of its fine cast, especially the star affirming performance by Julia Lester as Miss Marmelstein, the role that started Barbara Streisand's stage career.  The show itself, at least in its revised form, is an odd one that proves to be less than satisfying.

The full day marathon of Sean O'Casey's trilogy by Ireland's Druid theater company was a mixed bag, as I found only one play of the trilogy ("The Shadow of a Gunman") to be truly successfully staged.  Surprisingly, the other two plays ("The Plough and the Stars" and "Juno and the Paycock") suffered from pacing issues and uneven acting.

Finally, the Goodman Theatre production of Rebecca Gilman's "Swing State" at the Minetta Lane was a welcome opportunity to see a well constructed and acted serious drama, although I had some credibility issues with the way the central character was written.  The play nevertheless packs an emotional wallop and is worth seeing.


Sunday, October 08, 2023

Raucous & Rollicking "Rocky Horror" Rocks the Kalita Theater

How does one make the very campy, intentionally inane 1973 minted musical "Rocky Horror Show" feel fresh and current?  Indeed, the last few "Rocky Horror" stage productions I have seen, including its last Broadway revival in 2000, left me feeling that the show was becoming a bit stale.  Who would have thought it would take the close minded, right wing, holier than thou Texas GOP state legislators to give the show a new reason for being?  Certainly not me, but in passing the clearly unconstitutional (and thankfully temporarily suspended by the Federal Courts), sexual suggestion banning SB12, those legislators have inadvertently given new life to this musical.  That is abundantly clear in Dallas Theater Center's fearless, joyfully campy, entertaining, blissful "Rocky Horror" production that is skewering the prim spirit of SB12 on a nightly basis at Dallas' Kalita Theater.

Director Blake Hackler has skillfully assembled the cast and show elements, all while embracing, as he states in his program notes, "the absurd and the outrageous."   Two performances among the hard working cast stand out as key anchors of this production.  First, David Lungo's standup fueled Narrator elicits  hysterical audience laughter, with several allusions to the political undercurrents unleashed by SB12 and its ilk being among his funniest exchanges.  He holds this otherwise unwieldy show together.  And then there is my favorite Frank N' Furter of all time- L.Walter, who is fierce, funny and frolicsome, and commands complete attention every moment he is on stage. 

Some of the production's musical numbers could have been tighter in execution, although I caught the show early in its run and I suspect it will gain some precision in the course of its month long engagement.  And to be fair, precision is not essential to making an entertaining "Rocky Horror."

Indeed, I had a great time watching this "Rocky Horror," and I appreciated its ability to make the show feel timeless.  However, I left the theater spooked in one significant way- namely, this production highlighted that if SB12 or similar laws were to go into effect one day, the harmless joy that I witnessed on stage might land its participants in jail.  That threat has not gone away, making this production of "Rocky Horror" nothing less than an urgent call to action to ensure this never happens.

Monday, March 20, 2023

Spring Theater in NY: A Mesmerizing "Doll's House," A Lackluster "Sweeney Todd," & Updating Mythology Through a Black Lens in "Black Odyssey"

Spring theater in New York is approaching full bloom, and my latest visit was a mixed bag of shows.

By far, the best show of my visit was the Jamie Lloyd directed adaptation (by Amy Herzog) of Ibsen's "A Doll's House," which features a bravura performance by Jessica Chastain as Nora.  Herzog's adaptation, Lloyd's direction and Chastain's "can't take my eyes off of her" performance are perfectly in synch, yielding a production almost entirely centered on Chastain's Nora.  My interpretation is that the show is set in Nora's mind, with her remembering the actions that take place on stage.  This interpretation is buttressed by the pre-show appearance of Nora/Chastain seated on a circular roundtable where for appoximately 15 minutes she appears to be engaged in deep thought as other cast members slowly appear and take their own seats. 

The set design is minimalistic, which allows for greater focus on the words that are crisply and clearly delivered via the outstanding sound design.  This production calls for audience focus, and thankfully the audience at my performance was blissfully silent and seemingly rapt throughout the almost 2 hour intermission-less show.  This "Doll's House" feels current, urgent and explosive in no small part due to Chastain's beautifully rendered performance.  Audience complaints about the lack of set design or stage interaction (and there are quite a few such complaints being made) seem to me to miss the point of the bold and daring vision of the show's artistic creators.

Count me in the "not horrible, but far from great" camp for the lackluster "Sweeney Todd" revival currently playing on Broadway.  Josh Groban is miscast and proves the considerable limits of his acting abilities, Annaleigh Ashford starts out great but by the end seems to be mugging too much, and Jordan Fisher is not up to the demands of singing "Johanna," one of Sondheim's most beautiful tunes.  The choreography does not fit the show, and at times made the staging look like a Disney musical, and a bad one at that.   I also cannot help but plead for the removal of the cheap mechanical bird that furiously flaps its plastic wings as Fisher begins to sing "Johanna," which is beyond absurd and distracting.  The sound design is also lacking as the orchestra sounded way too quiet from my Row K orchestra seat.  The set design is just okay, but is overly clunky in Act 2.  Going in, I did not think Thomas Kail was the right director for this show, and what I saw on stage confirmed that fact.

On the positive side,  Gaten Matarazzo and Ruthie Ann Miles provide worthy dimensions to their roles, and Jamie Jackson and John Rapson are quite good as the Judge and Beadle (which they also proved to be in prior, better productions of this show).  In the end, I see no reason to see this show if you have seen prior professional productions of "Sweeney Todd," and this production in no way justifies the outrageously high prices being charged for tickets.

Although it could use a few more revisions by an expert dramaturge, I was thoroughly engaged, entertained and ultimately moved by Classic Stage Company expertly cast Marcus Gardley play "black odyssey," which revisits the Odysseus saga as seen through a Black American lens.  Stevie Walker-Webb's direction is sharp as he guides this journey of his supremely talented cast.  Yes, the play can be a bit messy at times, but perhaps that messiness is itself a comment on the black experience in contemporary America.

I caught the Signature Theatre's revival of Samuel D. Hunter's "Bright New Boise" in its last week of performances, and was glad that I did so.  I did not care for a prior production of this play I saw years ago at small theater in Los Angeles.  But Signature's production, which featured an excellent cast smartly directed by Oliver Butler made the best case I can imagine for this play, even if the ending still did not fully land for me.  Among the fine cast was the stunning young actor Ignacio Diaz-Silverio, who gives a career making performance here that portends his likely great future as an actor.

I also enjoyed Suzan-Lori Parks' musical adaptation of the film "The Harder They Come," which has an infectious energy even if it is unable to overcome the many cliches contained in the underlying work.  The talented cast and band go a long way towards making this show sing, and it never overstays its two hour running time.

MCC Theater's presentation of Soho Rep's "Wolf Play," proved to be a worthwhile exercise in theatrical ingenuity, although for me the inventive staging somewhat masks the elemental and basic nature of the underlying script.

Finally, despite some nice staging and a few good performances, Keith Bunin's "The Coast Starlight" at Lincoln Center Theater's Mitzi Newhouse lacked credibility and nuance, which left me feeling both disappointed and sour as to why this feeble play was accorded the considerable resources this prominent venue.




Monday, January 09, 2023

"The Whale" -A Great Play Becomes A Bad Movie

In 2012, I had one of my most rewarding and emotional theater experiences at Playwrights Horizons watching an exemplary cast (led by Shuler Hensley in the lead role of Charlie) perform Samuel D. Hunter's excellent play "The Whale."  I was so moved by the ending that I recall having to sit down in my seat for several minutes after the curtain call to reorient myself before rejoining the world outside the theater on 42nd Street.  Aided by Hunter's fine writing, Hensley's fine acting and Davis McCallum's precise direction, I formed deep wells of empathy for each of the play's characters, but especially for the lead character Charlie.  The ending gutted me.

Needless to say, I was somewhat skeptical when I heard that "The Whale" was being adapted into a film, even though Hunter was signed on as the screenwriter.  Hunter's theatrical works share much more than a geographical locus (in or near Idaho); they also typically mine deep wells of empathy for their finely wrought characters.  That is easier to do in the confines of live theater, and much more difficult to pull off in the much cooler medium of film.  But I was hopeful that the film could at least come close to approximating my 2012 experience in the theater.

Unfortunately, the film adaptation of "The Whale" not only failed to engage my empathy, but I found it a downright distasteful experience that I endured for its entire 117 minute running time only because I kept hoping it would improve.  It never improved.

So how does such a fine play become such a terrible film?  It is not the writing.  After watching the film I went back and read the play script, and while there were changes in the writing, the bulk of the play's dialogue is up on the screen.  I did note that in the play Charlie is constantly apologizing with repeated instances of  "I'm sorry" that I do not recall in the film.  I surmise that someone thought the often repeated self-deprecating "sorrys" of Charlie in the play script that were intended to (and did) evoke empathy, might be annoying on film.   But that is the only aspect of the writing changes that I thought could account for my very different reactions to the on stage Charlie as compared with his screen counterpart.

I was not impressed with Brendan Fraser's performance as Charlie, but I will cut him some slack because any actor would be challenged to realistically emote under all the latex and makeup in which his body and face are covered.  I think the fault in failing to successfully adapt the play lies primarily with Director Darren Aronofsky.  Aronofsky does everything he can, from making Charlie an unhuman appearing puppet, to grotesquely focusing on Charlie's gluttonous eating binges, to distance the film viewer from feeling for Charlie.  Indeed, it is very difficult to feel empathy for the on screen Charlie when Aronfsky's directorial choices seem aimed at making Charlie an inhuman freak.  Aronofsky's goal seems to be to evoke revulsion rather than empathy, and as such are in direct conflict with the essence of Hunter's words.

Would the film have worked in the hands of a director more attuned with Hunter's writing?  We will never know, but what I do know is that I cannot recommend seeing the film "The Whale" unless you want to explicate how a great play can be made in to a bad film.

Wednesday, December 14, 2022

The 10 Best Theatrical Productions of 2022

For the first time since 2019 [i.e., the year before Covid hit] this past year saw theater produced all 12 months of the year.  Accordingly, I am resuming my end of year top 10 list of favorite theatrical productions, which has been on hiatus since 2019.  In order of preference my 10 best shows of 2022, comprised of 7 new works (including 4 new musicals) and 3 revivals, were:

1. KIMBERLY AKIMBO [Broadway]

2. FAT HAM [Public]

3. COST OF LIVING [Broadway]

4. INTO THE WOODS [Broadway]

5. TOPDOG/ UNDERDOG [Broadway]

6. STRANGE LOOP [Broadway]

7. CASE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD [Signature Theatre]

8. CYRANO DE BERGERAC [BAM]

9. SUFFS [Public]

10. SOME LIKE IT HOT [Broadway] 

Honorable MentionsDOWNSTATE [Playwrights Horizons]; MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG [NYTW]; PRAYER FOR THE FRENCH REPUBLIC [Manhattan Theater Club]; CONFEDERATES [Signature Theatre]; RAISIN IN THE SUN [Public]

Among the things that stood out for me this year were a series of remarkable acting duos rendering expertly synchronized performances that yielded astounding stage chemistry.  Prime examples of this were the performances of Kimberly Clark & Justin Cooley in "Kimberly Akimbo"; Corey Hawkins & Yahya Abdul-Mateen II in "Topdog/ Underdog"; Katy Sullivan & David Zayas in "Cost of Living"; Jonathan Groff & Daniel Radcliff in "Merrily We Roll Along"; and Gavin Creel & Joshua Henry as the Princes in "Into The Woods."

And a special word about my favorite show of 2022- the musical "Kimberly Akimbo."  I cannot praise this show enough, although I will be the first to confess that it hits the personal sweet spot for me in terms of a musical.  It is sweet, without being saccharine; sports a beautiful score with several songs conveying the interior thoughts of characters that reduced me to tears each of the 3 times I have seen this show, and remains hopeful and life-affirming without ignoring the darker aspects of life.  For me, this is the rare show that I venture I will never get tired of seeing, and one that I suspect will ultimately be among my favorite musicals of all time.

Tuesday, November 01, 2022

"Cost of Living," "Topdog Underdog," & "Kimberly Akimbo" Are Highlights of NY Fall Theater

New York theater offerings were slow to start at the outset at the outset of the fall, but the pace of new shows picked up in October, yielding three outstanding new Broadway productions that should not be missed.

The first of this trio is Martyna Majok's "COST OF LIVING" at Manhattan Theatre Club's Broadway stage which has been extended but ends its limited run on November 6.  I first saw this play in previews in 2017 at MTC's off-Broadway theater at NY City Center, and in 2017 I had a considerably different reaction to the play as compared with the current Broadway mounting.  Even though the director and two of the four actors were the same in 2017, to me the cast had not yet connected in the 2017 preview I saw, and that connection is essential to make the play's almost lyrical writing sing.  In the Broadway production each of the play's four actors beautifully mesh both with the playwright's words and each other, palpably conveying on stage the play's thematic exploration of our need for human connections.  At the conclusion of the Broadway production I was simply stunned into silence by the beauty of what I had witnessed on stage. 

This fall has seen a number of high profile Broadway revivals of past Pulitzer Prize winners, and none has been mounted as successfully as the second of my winning trio- Suzan-Lori Park's 2001 play "TOPDOG UNDERDOG."  The acting of this Kenny Leon directed two hander by Corey Hawkins and Yahya Abdul-Mateen is like a master class in precision depiction of sibling interactions and brings out aspects of Ms. Park's deeper than first appears work that I had not contemplated in prior "Topdog" productions  I have seen.  I always considered "Topdog" to be a very good play, but after seeing the current production, I now see it as a great one.   Going in, I was concerned that the play might feel dated in 2022, but this play is more like a fine wine that has been enhanced by the passage of time such that it now feels paradoxically both very current and timeless.

I cannot say I had the same positive reaction to two other Pulitzer winners revived on Broadway this fall.  I felt the current revival of Arthur Miller's "DEATH OF A SALESMAN" portraying the Loman family as African-American fell victim to some odd stylistic and anachronistic directorial and acting choices.  The ending still lands, but not nearly as powerfully as in the seminal Robert Falls directed 1999 revival starring the late Brian Dennehy.  And as much as I loved the performances of Samuel Jackson and Michael Potts in the current revival of August Wilson's "THE PIANO LESSON",  I am sorry to say the mis-calibrated performance of John David Washington as Boy Willie, and odd directorial choices particularly in Act 2 prevented this production from landing the play's powerful ending and made me yearn for the transcendence of the Ruben Santiago-Hudson directed 2012 Signature Theater revival.

The third show of the winning fall trio of NY shows is the Broadway transfer of "KIMBERLY AKIMBO" which I missed last fall in its off-Broadway Atlantic Theater premiere.  This is a musical adaptation of a funny, quirky 2003 David Lindsay-Abaire play that has added cast members and a solid Jeanine Tesori score in its musicalized form.  Much like the work from which this musical is derived, this is a funny, quirky show that uses the story of the teenage girl with a rare disease that causes her to rapidly age to convey the beauty, wonder and fragility of life.  Once again, the cast is stellar and in particular the performances of Victoria Clark as Kimberly and Justin Cooley (making an astonishing Broadway debut) as her teenage friend Seth are a wonder to behold.  If the measure of a great musical is that I come out of the theater wanting to see it again, this new musical passes that test and then some, although truth be told I left "Kimberly Akimbo" with both a tear in my eye and a smile on my face.

I found much less to like in Tom Stoppard's new Holocaust themed play "LEOPOLDSTADT," finding the Stoppard dialogue unduly declamatory and the acting & direction largely static, unfocused and not particularly dramatic.  Similar themes were much more effectively explored in last year's Josh Harmon play "Prayers For The French Republic."  On the musical front, I was largely bored by the mediocrely scored stage musical adaptation of Cameron Crowe's film "ALMOST FAMOUS," notwithstanding a few fine central performances. 

I was thrilled by another visit to the current Broadway revival of "INTO THE WOODS," which featured some cast changes that were by and large at least as good as the initial cast I saw in the summer.  And despite a miscast lead performance from Jim Parsons, I enjoyed revisiting the Ahrens-Flaherty-McNally musical "A MAN OF NO IMPORTANCE," even if this show now feels a bit dated.  Finally, I appreciated the audacious attempt to revive the musical "1776" in a contemporary and non-traditionally cast way, even if it does not always click on stage (which I believe is a deficiency in the musical as originally written).

All in all, there is a good deal of fine theater to see in New York this fall, most of it on Broadway.  Not surprisingly, the non-profit spaces of off-Broadway have not rebounded in terms of quantity and quality (if not quite in terms of box office receipts) as fast as Broadway, but I am hoping the balance of the fall and rest of the 2022-23 season make strides to address that current imbalance.

Saturday, July 09, 2022

"Fat Ham"- To Watch Online Or To Watch Live, That Is The Question

In the midst of the Covid lockdown, when experiencing live theater was nothing more than a memory of the past, Philadelphia's Wilma Theater filmed and streamed on-line a digital version of James Ijames' excellent new play "FAT HAM," a riff on "Hamlet" set an outdoor African American family wedding reception/barbecue in North Carolina.  I watched the digital stream at the time, and belived that it is one of the best digital theater offerings I had seen during Covid times.  The play's wit and themes translated into the on-line format, although at the time the ending felt to me a bit unearned.  Nevertheless, I felt that this was Ijames' best play I had seen to date and I was thrilled when it was awarded the 2022 Pulitzer for Drama ostensibly based on the script and online production by the Wilma.

When the Public announced that a live production of "Fat Ham" would be part of its 2021-22 season, I was interested in seeing how the play differed in its on-stage iteration.  Fortunately, the Public lined up a great director, cast and production crew to bring this play to its inaugural live staging.  Having now seen the outstanding and hugely entertaining Public production of "Fat Ham," my estimation of Mr. Ijames' play has grown enormously, revealing to me that the considerable comedy in "Fat Ham" begs out for a live staging and audience to realize its full potential.  Furthermore, only after seeing the play on stage was I able to see the how the play's ending is entirely earned and crucial to one of the play's central themes- dispensing with the endless cycles of trauma and celebrating the triumph of doing so.  Indeed, Ijames' brilliantly flips the tragedy of Shakespeare's original work, and in doing so makes what I interpret as a commentary on contemporary theater's tendency to feature African American plays that focus on black trauma.

Seeing how a live staging was essential for me to fully experience the breadth of "Fat Ham" reminds me of how important it is preserve the medium of live theater, sadly in a time when so many legitimate theaters are facing existential threats to their existence.  While digital stagings are better than nothing, like film and published texts, they are not full substitutes for the real thing.

On my recent trip to New York I also saw Lear DeBessonet's dreamily cast Encores! production of one of my all time favorite musicals, Sondheim's "Into The Woods" which is now playing in a limited run on Broadway.  The two and a half hours watching this show can only be classified as musical theater nirvana that mined the musical of all of its considerable wit, musicality, humor and emotion.  If you think you have already seen enough "Into The Woods" for a lifetime (something to which I would never subscribe), think again and see this outstanding production if you have the opportunity to do so.

I was also drawn in by Will Arbery's fine new play "Corsicana" at Playwrights Horizons, which centered on siblings, one of whom has Downs Syndrome, who are dealing with the recent loss of their mother.  Arbery's writing is somewhat elliptical but rings deeply true, although I would venture that this play needs a skilled director and cast to properly negotiate the play's silences and shifts.  Playwrights Horizons has graced Arbery's play with both in the hands of director Sam Gold and the fine cast he has assembled here.



Saturday, June 04, 2022

10 BEST SHOWS OF 2021/22 THEATER SEASON

I typically post an annual Best 10 list in December, but due to Covid and the resulting closure of most stage productions until the outset of the fall 2021 theater season, I did not post any such list in 2020 or 2021.  However, given the ramping up of stagings in the 2021/22 theater season (which runs from May 2021 to May 2022), I offer my below list of my 10 favorite productions of the 21/22 theater season.

1.  A STRANGE LOOP [Broadway]

2.  SANCTUARY CITY [NYTW]

3.  SUFFS [Public]

4.  A CASE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD [Signature Theatre]

5.  COMPANY [Broadway]

6.  CYRANO DE BERGERAC [BAM]

7.  CONFEDERATES [Signature Theatre]

8.  OUR TOWN [Dallas Theater Center]

9.  PRAYER FOR THE FRENCH REPUBLIC [MTC]

10. MUSIC MAN [Broadway]

Honorable Mentions: PASS OVER [Broadway]; CAROLINE OR CHANGE [Broadway]; THE CHINESE LADY [Public]

Remarkable Returns to Productions first seen in prior years: SIX [Broadway]; HANGMEN [Broadway]

BEST ACTOR/ACTRESS IN A MUSICAL: Jaquel Spivey, A STRANGE LOOP/ SHARON D. CLARKE, CAROLINE OR CHANGE

BEST ACTOR/ACTRESS IN A PLAY: James McAvoy, CYRANO/ Francis Benhamou, PRAYER FOR THE FRENCH REPUBLIC

BEST DIRECTOR OF A MUSICAL: Marianne Elliott, COMPANY

BEST DIRECTOR OF A PLAY: Rebecca Frecknall, SANCTUARY CITY

Sunday, May 08, 2022

Examining Empathy in "Strange Loop," "Case For The Existence of God" & "How I Learned To Drive"

Three well written and expertly staged shows now playing in New York struck me in the varying ways they elicit empathy in their characters and/or their audiences, making them worthwhile subjects for a deeper examination of this issue and its impact on these productions.

"A Strange Loop," a musical with book, music and lyrics by Michael R. Jackson, explores the internal thoughts (depicted by an on stage six person chorus of Thoughts) of a young, black, gay character named Usher, who is struggling writing a musical about the struggle of writing a musical about himself - hence one of many loops in the show.  I first experienced this exciting new work at Playwrights Horizons in 2019 when the role of Usher was played by Larry Owens.  I loved the unapologetic audacity of the show and its themes, and found it to be both deeply thoughtful and entertaining.  Although I thought the show needed some fine tuning, I was thrilled when it won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize for drama, an award that is not often bestowed on stage musicals.

I was a bit apprehensive about seeing the show again on Broadway when I heard that Larry Owens had left the production, as I would venture that the lead role is a very difficult one to cast and perform.  But seeing the show at the Lyceum Theatre last week was a treat well beyond my expectations, because not only had the show gained focus and fluidity on its way to Broadway, but the new actor playing Usher, Jaquel Spivey, gave a performance that was not only richer and deeper, but he seemed to channel the show's core themes in a way I had not experienced previously.  Without taking away any praise from Mr. Owens' fine work as Usher off-Broadway, I found Mr. Spivey's pitch perfect depiction of Usher's wounded vulnerability provided new layers of deep empathy in this work and its main character such that by the last song (the incredible summation song "A Strange Loop") I was in tears.  By tapping into and exemplifying the deep empathy that flows from the audience to the stage, the changes made to "A Strange Loop" in its Broadway incarnation, not the least of which was adding Mr. Spivey's award deserving performance, this show has risen in my estimation from a very good musical to one of my all time favorites.  I cannot wait to see it again,  as it is now a show that you don't just watch, rather you feel it in the depths of your heart and soul.

Empathy is employed somewhat differently in Samuel D. Hunter's beautifully written and staged new two-hander "A Case For The Existence Of God" now at Signature Theatre.  Here the empathy is depicted between the two on stage characters, Ryan (Will Brill) a mentally troubled, financially challenged Twin Falls, Idaho millennial and Keith (Kyle Beltran), a pent-up, gay, black, well educated mortgage broker who encounters Ryan at a day care facility for their respective daughters that leads to Ryan seeking Keith's help obtaining a mortgage.  Over the time depicted in the play, as an audience we watch the growing rapport and deep wells of empathy develop between these two characters, and the on stage connections are palpable to the audience.  Among the things I admire about Mr. Hunter's plays are their ability to tap into macro societal issues by means of micro explorations of characters, and that talent is on full display here.  I find this wonderful addition to Mr. Hunter's body of theatrical work to be further evidence that Hunter is among finest playwrights of our time.

I saw Paula Vogel's Pulitzer winning drama "How I Learned To Drive" 25 years ago at off-Broadway's Vineyard Theater.  While I appreciated Ms. Vogel's fine writing, the theme of the show (sexual abuse by a relative) was one that left me with an overwhelming sense of aversion for the wrongdoing uncle and his enabling wife.  Manhattan Theatre Club's current Broadway revival of "How I Learned To Drive" incredibly stars the same 3 principal actors as the original production- namely Mary Louise Parker, David Morse and Johanna Day.  Surprisingly, I thought all three actors were even better than I recalled.   Perhaps it is a combination of the aging of the actors (and hence their characters) and the wisdom we have gained in our #MeToo era that enabled me on a revisit to this play to not be so overwhelmed by aversion to the abuse that I was able to experience a deeper sense of sadness and/or empathy for the play's characters.  It is almost that with this play, the twenty five year time lapse between viewings enabled me to experience that time does indeed help to heal many wounds.

Among other shows I saw on my last visit to New York were a truly astounding, engrossing and of-the-moment "Cyrano de Bergerac" at Brooklyn Academy of Music featuring a tour de force performance of Cyrano by James McAvoy; a welcome return to Martin McDonagh's very funny and tightly written dark comedy "Hangmen"; an ambitious and splendidly staged revival of Thornton Wilder's "The Skin Of Our Teeth" that spins out of control in its second act; a lackluster and surprisingly obvious Tracey Letts political satire entitled "The Minutes"; a flaccid and dated revival of "Funny Girl"; and an early preview of Sarah Silverman's unfortunate "The Bedwetter," from which I could not run away fast enough.





Sunday, April 17, 2022

DOMINANT SOCIETY'S GAZE EXPLORED IN "CONFEDERATES," "SUFFS" & "THE CHINESE LADY"

Three shows I saw on a recent visit to New York shared a common central theme examining the effect of dominant society's gaze on outside groups, and although each show looks at different manifestations of dominant groups' gaze, all three are among the finest new theater of the season.

The most complex examination of this theme is in Dominque Morisseau's outstanding new play "CONFEDERATES" at Signature Theatre.  In this intricately layered and expertly produced play,  Ms. Morisseau focuses attention on two African American women (Sara and Sandra) in two alternating settings- in respectively, a Civil War era Southern plantation and in the faculty of a contemporary, primarily white University.  Many parallels are drawn between the treatment of these two central characters in these very different settings, but most fascinating to me was the exploration of the dominant society's (white and male) negative impact on characters who would seem to be natural allies of Sara and Sandra, but who act in ways that undermine them.  The actors playing characters other than Sara and Sandra have counterpart characters they play in the two time periods depicted (distinctions that are beautifully rendered in on stage costume changes) and comparing and contrasting these counterpart characters helps one unlock some of the themes at work in the play.  I had to sit with "Confederates" for a few days to fully appreciate the powerful impact of the show, which is a testament to the depth and complexity of the writing.

One of the things I most admire about Ms. Morisseau's work is that in each play she tackles a new form, structure or style that makes each of her plays distinct from their predecessors.  This makes me especially eager to see what will next emerge from this supremely gifted playwright.

Dominant society's (white and male again) subjugation of woman, ostensibly for their "protection," is also explored in Shaina Taub's entertaining and expertly cast new musical "SUFFS" receiving its world premiere at the Public Theater.  Sadly, going into the show I had little knowledge beyond the basics of the U.S. woman's suffrage movement of the early 20th Century, which says a great deal about the priorities of our educational system and my own failures to supplement my formal education through independent learning.  Through a combination of expertly drawn characters, tuneful songs and intelligently crafted lyrics, I was thoroughly entertained while being educated about the inner workings, drive, limitations and failings of the suffrage movement, and the impact of dominant male society (skillfully portrayed by the talented and diverse all female cast) on the successes and failures of the movement and the schisms that developed within that movement.  I was particularly intrigued by noting many of the tensions and tactics experienced by the suffrage movement as models for the civil rights and LGBT+ movements in later eras.

New musicals are extremely difficult to successfully pull off.  For me, Ms. Taub and her collaborators have pulled this one off and then some, creating what for me is the most successful new musical since "Hamilton" emerged from the Public over 7 years ago.

Perhaps the most direct examination of dominant society's (white and male yet again) gaze was in the recently closed Public Theater production of Lloyd Suh's "THE CHINESE LADY," inspired by the true story of the first Chinese woman brought to America who was put on display for paying audiences throughout America.  Expertly staged and impeccably acted by Shannon Tyo and Daniel Isaac, the play explores the corrosive impact of dominant society's literal and metaphorical gaze on the two characters depicted- Afong Moy (Shannon Tyo), the "Chinese Lady" put on display (Shannon Tyo) and her interpreter Atung (Daniel Isaac).  The final 20 minutes of the play suffers from a narrative didacticism that is at odds with the play up to that point, but it nevertheless provides the throughline to the unfortunate instances of anti-Asian racism we continue to experience in our current day.  

The three of the above mentioned plays proved to be the highlights of my recent theatergoing in New York City.  I also enjoyed Bryna Turner's comedy "AT THE WEDDING" at LCT3, which was largely powered by the tour de force comedic performance of the lead character played by Mary Wiseman.  Fine acting by Laurence Fishburne and Sam Rockwell similarly provide some incentive to see the Broadway revival of David Mamet's "AMERICAN BUFFALO" but sadly the play feels dated and underwhelming, although I confess to finding that to be the case for me with all of Mamet's theatrical output.  I would also recommend skipping the new Broadway musical "PARADISE SQUARE," which is unduly overwrought and provides only a few moments of excitement via its Bill T. Jones led choreography and an incandescent lead performance by Joaquina Kalukango.  Finally, the less said the better about Roundabout's Broadway production of Noah Haidle's insipid and depth-less new play "BIRTHDAY CANDLES."


 

Monday, February 07, 2022

The "Ick" Factor Defeats "MJ" and "Black No More"

Two new musicals, "MJ" and "Black No More," the former on Broadway and the latter off-Broadway but aiming for Broadway, have assembled strong casts and creative teams in their goal of finding commercial and critical success.  But both are undone by what I call the "ick" factor, a level of unintended discomfort that left this viewer unable to properly enjoy the works as a whole.

"MJ" is set in 1992 as its namesake Michael Jackson is preparing for his "Dangerous" concert tour, and the creators were clearly hoping to escape moral scrutiny by portraying a time period before the child abuse allegations against Jackson became public.  But they cannot escape inducing discomfort and derision in audience members who cannot forgive Jackson for his reprehensible actions involving children that were taking place at the time this show depicts, as well as later.   That was certainly the case for me, and the discomfort was thrust at me in reading the program note before the show that refers to Jackson as one of the greatest humanitarians of all time.  That note is beyond offensive and the creators of this show should be ashamed of sleight of hand they are trying to pull here.

I was hoping that "MJ" could somehow pull off separating the distasteful man from his art by just focusing on the musical and performance skills for which Jackson excelled.  When the show concentrates on the music and performance aspects of its namesake, the show provides great entertainment.  But Lynn Nottage's surprisingly pedestrian and uninspired book insists on telling the story behind the music and that is where the show simply cannot escape the ick factor in its aggrandizing someone who by his own words implicated himself in reprehensible actions involving children.  The songs are great, the dancing is great, the performers are great, the physical production elements are top notch.  But "MJ," by failing to separate the fatally flawed man from his art, sets itself up for defeat by discomfort.

In contrast to "MJ," "Black No More" does not provide some carefully crafted elements of entertainment, largely because despite having some outstanding talent in major roles (namely Brandon Victor Dixon, Ephraim Sykes, Lillias White, and Tamika Lawrence) this show is essentially a hot mess done in by the ick factor built into its lyrics and book.  The musical is an adaptation of the 1931 book by George S. Schuyler that tells the tale of a black scientist who invents a process of transforming people from black to white, and highlights a black character who undergoes the race changing process in pursuit of a white woman who rejects him for being black.  Admittedly that is not an easy tale to tell in 2022 without coming across as unduly offensive.  

Perhaps there is some way to tell this story in our current times without inducing unacceptable levels of viewer discomfort, but this show has not found the way to do so.  First, although the source material is considered a satire, this is played in a serious, rather than satirical, tone.  Second, the book spends about half of its time with racist white characters who regularly espouse offensive racial epitaphs that make the bulk of the show feel cringe-worthy and unwatchable.  And third, the primary protagonist played by the immensely talented Mr. Dixon cannot escape being tainted by the racists with whom he joins in racist solidarity, leaving the show with a rather reprehensible central character.  There is on line chatter that this show is aiming to be the next "Hamilton"- that is thinking that is as fantastical as the race changing fictional invention at the heart of this show, and no one will ever be in the room where that happens.



Wednesday, February 02, 2022

"COMPANY" and "MUSIC MAN" Show How To Successfully Revive A Musical In Different Ways

When reviving an often performed musical, revival creators may choose to reimagine/revise the original work in some significant way or stage something that is largely faithful to the original.  Personally, and especially with shows I have seen on multiple occasions, I tend to gravitate towards revivals that find a way to reconceive the original (like Nicholas Hytner's "Carousel" or Daniel Fish's "Oklahoma.")  But if traditional revivals get the major elements right, there are joys to be found in those revivals as well.

Currently playing on Broadway are Stephen Sondheim's "COMPANY" and Meredith Wilson's "THE MUSIC MAN," two hugely entertaining and successful musical revivals, one revisionist in nature and the other largely faithful to the original.  Both are attracting audiences that roar with delight and approval, and at least in the performances I saw, literally stop the shows at various times with sustained audience ovations.

The "Company" revival succeeds so well because from start to finish it sustains director Marianne Elliott's carefully conceived and psychologically astute substitution of a female lead protagonist  (the Bobby character) from the as originally written male lead character.  This re-thinking makes the work feel contemporary, fresh and refreshingly different from prior iterations of the show.  It also helps that Ms. Elliott has assembled a dream cast for this revival, not the least of which are Katrina Lenk as Bobbie, Matt Doyle as Jamie and Patti Lupone as Joanne.  I need two hands to count the number of "Company" production I have seen over the years, and the current revival is by the far the best one I have seen, and the staging of the song "Getting Married Today" is one of the most joyfully inventive musical numbers I have experienced on stage.

I was somewhat skeptical that director Jerry Zaks' production of "Music Man," even with Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster in the leads, would in any way justify the high prices it was charging.  This was based somewhat on my lack of enthusiasm for Zaks' "Hello Dolly" 2017 revival with Bette Midler, combined with finding the last production of "Music Man" I saw (the 2018 Marry Zimmerman production at Chicago's Goodman Theater) unexciting and dated.

But from the moment it began until its finale, the current revival of "Music Man" had me smiling from ear to ear.  Jackman and Foster are both hugely charismatic and have great on stage chemistry.  But beyond their sublime performances, the entire cast down to the smallest role is outstanding.  "Music Man" productions often falter in the performances of the children and younger characters, but kudos to the creators of this revival for finding an astounding collection of superb young talent.  It also helps that Wayne Carlyle's choreography feels fresh and exciting and highlights the considerable dancing skills of the Jackman and Foster.  The entire cast conveys a sense that they are having the times of lives on stage, and that joy is felt throughout the audience as evidenced by the very vocal audience reactions.  In short, the high ticket prices are amply justified by the musical theater perfection achieved by this revival.


Sunday, November 21, 2021

New York Theater Report: Powerful Performances, Energetic Audiences & Timeliness Matters

A few weeks ago I was able to see a number of Broadway and off-Broadway shows in New York with the mixed results that would be expected given the range of shows I attended.  Upon reflection, the shows seemed to fit in one of three categories for me- shows elevated by powerful performances, shows energized by the pre-pandemic-like fervor of the audience and finally shows that aim to tackle social themes that felt either timely or unfortunately dated.

Powerful Central Performances Elevate "Caroline" & "Room"

Historically, I have not been a huge fan of the Tony Kushner/ Jeanine Tesori musical "Caroline or Change," which I first saw in previews at the Public in 2003, and felt was improved, yet still flawed, in the 2004 Broadway production.  The most significant issue for me has been the disconnect between the minor stakes of the personal story and the larger social issues acknowledged in the show.  However, the stunning central performance of Sharon D. Clarke as Caroline in the current Roundabout Theater production (imported from London and directed by Michael Longhurst) does the best job I have seen to date in bridging the show's inherent disconnect and making this a musical that for the first time fully engaged me.  Ms. Clarke does this by conveying the wounded nature of her spirit through her quiet fortitude in a steely, yet commanding performance from which I could not avert my eyes.  She made me see the how the personal wounds intersected with the larger social issues in a way that helped me bridge the gap left by my prior experiences with this show.  If you have a chance to see this show with Ms. Clarke, I highly recommend doing so.

The idea of a staging the precise transcript of the pre-arrest interrogation of Reality Winner, who was arrested for leaking classified information on Russian election hacking in 2017, does not seem like an especially good idea.  Indeed, the only way to make it work would be to find an actress who could turn in a performance as Ms. Winner that would be simultaneously quirky and compelling enough to demand audience attention.  Fortunately for Director/Conceiver Tina Satter, Emily Davis was chosen for the lead role in "Is This A Room" which played on Broadway following several successful off-Broadway runs.  Ms. Davis rules the stage as Reality Winner in a way that leads me to believe that her every movement and utterance is extremely well crafted and choreographed, the end result being that my eyes were glued to her throughout.  With assistance from the also perfectly choreographed sound and lighting effects, I was on the edge of my seat throughout the play's approximately one hour running time.  That this offbeat play found a home on Broadway (playing in rep with the equally outstanding "Dana H" that I saw pre-pandemic at the Vineyard) is surprising and encouraging, although the early closing for both in rep productions adds a dose of Broadway market reality to these winners.  Kudos to the producers for taking a chance on these unique and terrific productions.

Energetic Audiences of "Six" & "Little Shop" Conquer Covid Anxieties

Sitting in audience as vocal, joyful and engaged as the recent audiences I was in for the musicals "Six" on Broadway and "Little Shop of Horrors" at the off-Broadway Westside Theater enabled all of my Covid era anxieties to dissipate into the ether during the running times of both shows.  Both audiences were the first ones I experienced since March 2020 that could not be distinguished from the most vocal and engaged pre-pandemic theater audiences I experienced.  I loved both productions for the enormous entertainment they provided, and I hope both are harbingers for what can be achieved in the post-pandemic theater audiences of the future.  Indeed, if you are in need of booster shot of theatrical energy, might I suggest by a ticket to "Six" or the Michael Mayer directed revival of "Little Shop"?

Social Themes Feel Timely in "Thoughts of a Colored Man" & "Twilight LA," But Dated in "The Visitor" and "Morning Sun"

The vignette structured style of "Thoughts of a Colored Man" would not on paper seem to be an effective way to tackle timely racial themes addressed in Keenan Scott II's play, and admittedly that style of play is not one that usually works for me.  Thus, I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed and appreciated the play and its fine actors, staging and direction (by Steve H. Broadnax III).  There is enough of a character and narrative through line to make the play work on an emotional level, and my enjoyment of the play was aided by the fact that I was by far in the minority as a non-BIPOC audience member.  The fact this play is drawing a largely BIPOC audience is encouraging as a sign of the increasing diversity of Broadway audiences, although without the public reporting of Broadway audiences one cannot gauge the commercial impact of the show that producers will unquestionably consider in the future.

Signature Theatre's revival of Anna Deavere Smith's "Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992" substitutes the play's one person monologue format for a five person cast that mostly (but not entirely) sticks to the monologue delivered format.  For a work that tackled "of the moment" racial issues of nearly three decades ago, it is somewhat dispiriting to report that the same issues are at the forefront of US society today.  That makes the play feel current and timely, and the show continues to excel and illuminate on an intellectual level.  But I would remiss in failing to note that the altered delivery style of using a 5 person cast in lieu of one person delivered monologues saps the play of some of its humor, and at least for me, much of its emotional appeal.  That is strange for me to say because as a general rule, I don't care for one person shows because they rarely have an emotional impact on me.  Granted, it helps to have Anna Deavere Smith be the one person delivering the play, as was the case when I first saw this play in 1993 at Los Angeles' Mark Taper Forum.  While the emotional impact of the play was lessened by having it performed by a talented five person cast (in which the incomparable Francis Jue is the standout), it is nevertheless a beautifully written work that deserves to be experienced by today's audiences.

In contrast to the above mentioned productions, the new musical adaptation of the 2007 film "The Visitor" at the Public and Simon Stephens' Greenwich Village set and wonderfully cast play "Morning Sun" attempt to take social issues in ways that feel dated and uninteresting, with both plays centering on characters who are significantly less compelling than the events taking place around them.  Both shows quickly evaporated in my mind as I walked away from them.  I hope to see less of their kind in the future.

Finally, what can I say about the comedy "Chicken and Biscuits" other than I appreciate the effort, but much as I felt watching the painful "Designing Women" play recently streamed by Arkansas' TheatreSqaured, sitcoms and attempts at sitcom humor are not what I go to theater to experience.  



Saturday, September 25, 2021

A Welcome Return To NYC Theater With "Sanctuary City," "Sun & Sea," "Pass Over," & "Merry Wives"

You don't know how much you miss something, until it is taken away for far too long.

Those are the words echoing in my mind as I sat down to my first (and fully vaxxed/masked) theater performances in New York City last week.   I will be the first to admit that I was so ecstatic just to be back in a live theater audience again, that it was hard to find much fault with what I saw on various stages throughout the city.  To do otherwise felt ungrateful for the sacrifices made by theater artists, producers and venues to continue presenting live theater in the face of such uncertainty and potential peril.  Nevertheless, most of the shows I saw would have have thrilled me in any other pre-Covid era of theater going, although the emotions elicited by a great theater experience were especially invigorating in my welcome return to live theater.

I was concerned that post-Covid theater would be overly dominated by safe, audience pleasing works to act as a balm to Covid weary audiences.  To be fair, I understand that impulse especially when theater programmers are concerned about the willingness of audiences to return to live performances.  Thus, I was relieved to find in several instances the return of thematically challenging and uniquely structured works to NY stages.

I found such relief in Rebecca Frecknall's breathtaking staging of Martyna Majok's excellent "Sanctuary City" presented by New York Theatre Workshop (@NYTW79) at the Lucille Lortel Theatre.  Set in the early years of the millennium, the play focuses on the challenging issues faced by two young undocumented immigrants in New Jersey played to perfection by Jasai Chase-Owens and Sharlene Cruz.  In series of time shifting, sometimes fractured dialogue laden scenes that comprise the first half of the show, we gain insight on the lives, challenges and deep personal connections these two characters experience as they complete their high school educations.  Majok's form busting structure, punctuated by Frecknall's propulsive directorial choices, kept me on the edge of my seat.

The second half of "Sanctuary City" follows a more traditional style, in direct contrast to the prior scenes.  Some viewers have criticized the abrupt change, but I cannot help but feel the switch was a brilliant choice by Majok to contrast the sanctuary the two main characters find in each other in the first half, with the impact of outside forces that permeate the second half and complicate the lives and connections of the two main characters.  This contrast helps illuminate and deepen the play's themes.  I hope this production, which initially began previews before the shutdown in early 2020 and which NYTW took a risk in remounting, finds the audience it so well deserves.

I found further evidence that challenging work will be undertaken at the Brooklyn Academy of Music (@BAM) where the Venice Biennale Gold Lion winning Lithuanian opera "Sun & Sea" by Lina Lapelyte, Vaiva Grainyte and Rugile Barzdziukaite was mounted and presented to sell out audiences.  BAM's Fisher black box space is transformed into a sandy and sunny beach loaded with surreptitiously placed singers amidst active supernumeraries that include casual beachgoers, noisy children, several dogs, cell phone addicted sun worshippers, badminton players and sunscreen slathering couples, many of whom interact with one another in the course of this looping hour (ish) long performance that tackles aspects of global warming, ecological displacement, urban ennui and classism.  The modern minimalist style music is hauntingly beautiful and captures a mood that permeates and heightens the meticulously constructed environment.  The staging may be technically observational, but by refraining form using lighting or other design cues to highlight active singers, the staging forces the viewer to do the work of framing each scene, thereby making the work feel more participatory than observational.  A brilliant choice for this audacious and engaging work.

"Sun & Sea" is touring to several other US cities, including Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Bentonville, Arkansas (at the Crystal Bridges Museum's contemporary space).  If you have the chance to see this show, don't miss it.

Kudos also go to the producers who remounted Antoinette Chinonye Nwandu's timely and exceedingly relevant play "PASS OVER."  The three person cast, consisting of Steppenwolf Theater's Jon Michael Hill and Namir Smallwood supplemented by Broadway regular Gabriel Ebert, are a joy to watch.  Every movement each character makes seems to be carefully thought out and precisely choreographed, credit for which goes to Director Danya Taymor and her excellent actors.  "Pass Over" is funny, moving and particularly thought provoking given the race and hate motivated attacks we have increasingly discovered over the past year and a half.  I must admit that I found the newly revised ending jarringly inconsistent with the balance of the play, and I am just not sure it makes for a satisfying whole.  But in context, this may just be nitpicking because overall this is a hugely rewarding work creatively speaking that deserves to be seen on Broadway.  I wish this too could find the audience it deserves, but based on audience size on the evening I attended, I would guess that this is sadly not the case.  But again, I applaud the producers who enabled me to experience this fine work on a Broadway stage.

I also had the privilege of experiencing a joyous return to the Public Theater's (@PublicTheaterNY) Shakespeare In The Park production of Jocelyn Bioh's "Merry Wives" Harlem African immigrant community set adaptation of Shakespeare's "The Merry Wives of Windsor."  Yes, the acting was at times unveven, and the adaptation is a somewhat unfocused (perhaps an homage to the rather unfocused Shakespeare original that proved you can have too much Falstaff).  But from the moment the drums began at the outset to the glorious opening up of Beowulf Boritt's colorful set towards the end, I was enraptured to be back in Central Park under the stars enjoying a live theater performance with engaged fellow audience members who seemed to join me in celebrating the that Shakespeare's themes are not the sole province of a euro-centric white artists.

I also found much to admire, including fine acting, in Second Stage's mounting of the Rajiv Joseph's Letters of Suresh and in the culmination of Richard Nelson's Rhinebeck cycle of plays, "What Happened?: The Michaels Abroad."  While neither reached the heights I experienced in the aforementioned plays discussed above, both plays still provided for satisfying evenings in the theater that no small screen viewing could ever fairly replicate.

I am happy to report that theater in New York is back and at times as fresh and exciting as ever.  Fingers crossed we can keep it that way.

Finally, a word about tomorrow's Tony Awards ceremonies.  I don't care who wins or loses.  I do care that the theater community shows up and celebrates the return of live theater in New York.  That is what this year's show is about.  I would much prefer that the awards were not split between bifurcated ceremonies, one of which is on a subscription only platform (albeit one that provides a seven day free trial that is more than sufficient to allow for free viewing of the first two hours on Paramount Plus).  But again, I am pleased that they are happening and will mark a guidepost to the beginning of a new era in New York theater.